The question on many Nigerians’ minds today is whether President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is truly committed to democracy or gradually transforming into a dictator cloaked in democratic robes. His leadership, marked by bold economic reforms, sweeping political maneuvers, and an aggressive consolidation of power, has sparked intense debate. While some hail him as a decisive leader steering Nigeria towards progress, others warn that his governance style bears troubling signs of authoritarianism.
From the moment he assumed office on May 29, 2023, Tinubu wasted no time in making radical decisions that would shake the foundations of Nigeria’s economy and governance. The removal of fuel subsidies—an action taken within hours of his inauguration—sent shockwaves across the country. While his supporters argue that this move was necessary to stabilize the economy, the reality on the ground paints a grim picture. Inflation soared to 28.92% by December 2023, food prices hit unprecedented highs, and millions of Nigerians found themselves grappling with the harshest cost-of-living crisis in recent history. The Naira, which traded at ₦450 per dollar before his tenure, spiraled beyond ₦1,500 per dollar within months, eroding purchasing power and plunging more people into poverty.
His handling of opposition voices and critics has further fueled concerns about a creeping dictatorship. The sudden arrest and detention of political figures such as Godwin Emefiele, former CBN Governor, and Abdulrasheed Bawa, ex-EFCC Chairman, raised eyebrows. While corruption allegations against them may hold water, the selective nature of these prosecutions has led many to question whether Tinubu is genuinely fighting corruption or simply eliminating threats to his political stronghold. The government’s move to silence dissenting voices, including controversial crackdowns on labor unions and civil society organizations, sends warning signals about the direction Nigeria’s democracy is heading.
On the political front, Tinubu’s firm grip over the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the National Assembly further strengthens the argument that he is consolidating power in a manner reminiscent of past strongmen. The appointment of loyalists into key positions—from the executive cabinet to economic agencies—has sparked allegations that he is building a government that serves his personal interests rather than the Nigerian people. The removal of opposition figures from strategic roles and the perceived weakening of the judiciary raise legitimate fears of an administration that brooks no opposition.
Security remains a major test of his leadership, and his approach has been both aggressive and controversial. In a bid to combat terrorism, banditry, and separatist movements, the Tinubu administration has ramped up military operations in troubled regions. However, reports of extrajudicial killings, human rights abuses, and the stifling of protests suggest that brute force is being prioritized over democratic dialogue. Amnesty International and other rights groups have documented cases of crackdowns on peaceful demonstrations, including the suppression of protests against economic hardship. If this trend continues, Nigeria risks sliding into a police state where fear replaces freedom.
Despite these concerns, Tinubu’s defenders argue that his leadership is misunderstood. They point to his record as Lagos State governor, where he transformed the state into an economic powerhouse, as proof that he is a reformist rather than a dictator. They believe his tough decisions are aimed at long-term national prosperity rather than short-term popularity. His supporters argue that his restructuring of key economic policies—including the unification of exchange rates and the removal of fuel subsidies—are painful but necessary steps toward fiscal stability.
Yet, the ultimate question remains: Does Nigeria need a firm hand or a listening ear? In a democracy, leadership should not be about fear and control but about inclusivity, accountability, and the ability to respond to the needs of the people. If President Tinubu truly believes in democracy, he must ensure that his administration welcomes dissent, upholds human rights, and prioritizes the welfare of ordinary Nigerians. Otherwise, history may remember him not as the reformer he claims to be but as a leader who gradually drifted from democracy to dictatorship.
