“In my heart I know you didn’t come here just for me, you came here because you believe in what this country can be. In the face of war, you believe there can be peace. In the face of despair, you believe there can be hope. In the face of a politics that’s shut you out, that’s told you to settle, that’s divided us for too long, you believe we can be one people, reaching for what’s possible, building that more perfect union.”
Barack Obama (“A More Perfect
Many, if not all, agree that
Well, what we never seem to agree on is the solution! But before we worry too much on our points of disagreements, perhaps you might still be wondering how
Hence,
Speaking of where we are now; forty eight years after independence we have a constitution. It is true this constitution is fatally flawed on two grounds: it was never a product of any form of minimum negotiations by
Why transitional? It is true that original constitution was achieved by negotiation in a series of conferences starting with the London Constitutional Conferences. Furthermore, it is also true that this particular constitution includes elements of fairness and justice that is absent in the present which makes it viable for use during transition. For example, the independence constitution was more respectful of the diversity of the country and has true federalism imprinted all over it. It is also, more federalist in its revenue sharing clauses- putting derivation at its heart and addressing the concerns of resource rich states which are largely minority ethnic nationality dominated.
However, this constitution was devoid of the level of participation and consensus one will expect from a national treatise. It was more or less an agreement between the majority ethnic groups to the exclusion of the minorities. The concerns of the minority ethnic nationalities of the Niger Delta and Middle Belt are as such better addressed in a proposed conference of ethnic nationalities – a new dialogue for
What then are the issues that should be addressed in the conference of ethnic nationalities? First is the fundamental necessity of a union.
The product of the conference of ethnic nationality should not be a constitution; rather, declaration of a Commonwealth and the broad principles guiding the union will be more appropriate. The commonwealth should be based on an economic union and geopolitical need to be big and strong. Should secession be discussed as part of the alternatives at such conference? I say absolutely! Again, I am of the opinion that giving every state in Nigeria a single vote and aggregating the vote for or against secession, I believe secession will not see the light of the day: because there are more things that unite ordinary Nigerians than what the elites use to divide us.
Creating a new constitution is then a logical next step after the declaration of a commonwealth agreeable to all. This task should be delegated to statesmen who have distinguished themselves in the prior conference. For a constitution to be durable it must be devoid of unnecessary details but must imbibe the spirit of the union which it seeks to direct. The lessons of the First Republic Constitution and its successors on fairness and equity in wealth distribution must be remembered when designing a new constitution for the Commonwealth. This must involve acknowledging not suppressing the diversity of the new commonwealth. It should mean adopting the federal spirit and practice of our founding fathers: with each current constituent state and future ones required to adopt a constitution and an identity before admission into the commonwealth.
Prudence should steer the framers towards devolving power away from the center to the states. The center should accept taxes from the unit states and should be responsible for currency, international trade, defense, and foreign relations. The constituent states should retain most of their revenues, but they should also shoulder more responsibilities for affairs within their states. The Commonwealth central government should retain the power to regulate interstate commerce. As an advocate for a government that works; the lessons for the framers of the new commonwealth constitution will never be complete without an eye on cutting waste, improving government efficiencies, enhancing accountability and ensuring stability.
While I believe a federal and devolved state will tackle a number of these concerns, I am also a firm believer that either a quasi-parliamentary system or a part-time presidential (executive model) system where its participants are not remunerated at the unit (state) level is more appropriate for a developing nation like
Last but not the least; the new constitution must accommodate a home grown rig-proof electoral system. We have a winner in the modified open ballot system but this does not mean brilliant minds cannot even come up with some better and brighter. A commonwealth where elections count for something will ensure the stability, survival and continued prosperity of our new union.
The superiority of the idea to restructure
Don’t tell me all that have been enumerated above is impossible. Of course, I am aware that it is harder being an optimist than a patriot in my country- as hard enough as patriotism is to come by. Nigerians are cynical. The cynicism directed at our institutions, our government and politicians has fed a cycle of lethargy. Cynicism is the engine that drives the Nigerian malady; it drives the corruption of the officeholder in charge today and the potential ineptitude of the one yet unborn. We have in the process of losing faith in our country, lost faith in ourselves and the thirst to change what is, while focusing on what can be. Far from dreaming and hoping for a better
Being a patriot by the way does not mean supporting the status quo. It doesn’t even mean being against secession. Being a patriot means having an abiding believe in the innate abilities of your country, and her people to make changes for the better. Don’t tell me
The reason why
Your inputs have improved the quality and content of this last chapter in a series of three. I had written the first two articles about three months ago- in the heat of the summer: save for minor editing. Because of my habitual summer vacation from writing, I had held off their release until the fall. But I refused to write the last chapter in the series because I was not convinced I could do so effectively until I hear the other side. I am very convinced that secession is a bad idea in light of global realities of the 21st century. I am also very convinced that