The first major player in the complicated oil game, undoubtedly is the Federal Republic of Northern Nigeria. The corrupt, incompetent, visionless and morally bankrupt northern led Nigerian government is mainly responsible for the crises, and the impoverishment in the
2. Multinational oil companies.
The second major player in the
3. Major importers of
A substantial proportion of the
In his two shockingly revealing books: “Confessions of an economic hit man” and “The Secret History of the American Empire: The Truth About Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and How to Change the World,” John Perkins, an American himself, laid bear the heinous crimes that the United States and multinational oil companies commit in developing countries in order to defend their economic interests . The United States through its intelligence body, the CIA, operates a sophisticated spying network in all countries that are members of Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries, (OPEC) the voluntary international club of oil producing countries set up to regulate oil production or output among its members in order not to flood the market with excess oil which may lead to plummeting of oil prices in the global oil market. The CIA, with the full backing of the
4. The
The fourth player in the
The Minor players. Apart from these 3 major players described above, there are new and minor players like the retired northern criminal officers who were dashed oil wells for their disservice to
DAVID VERSUS GOLIATH.
As we can observe, the N.D. and its militants have formidable opponents to overcome in order to achieve their objective. However, this does in no way mean that they can not be defeated.
The battle between the N.D. militants and these 3 formidable opponents reminds one of the biblical battle between David and Goliath. In that biblical story, Goliath, because of his enormous size and strength, was expected to emerge winner. David had no chance whatsoever. But David, miraculously, emerged the winner, against all odds! The task ahead of the N.D. militants today is even much tougher than that of David in the bible because David went into a duel with only one Goliath, but the N.D. militants are battling 3 GOLIATHS! And these are not 3 ordinary Goliaths, but 3 HORRIBLE AND HEARTLESS GOLIATHS that control and consume more than at least half of the world energy, and are ready to go to any length in order to defend their selfish economic interests even if it means wiping out completely a whole country, race or continent. As far as they are concerned, it’s the end that justifies the means. They are guided by the principle “WE LIVE AND YOU ALL DIE. Despite their strength, resources and influence, nevertheless, I am convinced beyond any reasonable doubts that with the appropriate tactics, strategy, discipline, perseverance and determination, the N.D. militants will overcome these 3 monsters standing in their way. One of the main purposes of this article is to expose their weak points, and prove that indeed they are not only very vulnerable, but could be handed defeat, with the right tactics and strategy.
GET YOUR STRATEGY AND TACTICS RIGHT.
In this article, we will be talking a lot about strategy and tactics. It’s so important in our discussion that we need to explain the difference between the two from the onset. A strategy is like a plan of action. Tactics are the instruments or methods that you use in realising your strategy or plan. Tactics and strategy are inseperatable – they are like a coin with 2 sides. One is not complete without the other. They both complement each other. The more risky a task, the more careful you should be in choosing your strategy and tactics. The more important a task, the more refined your strategy and tactics should be. If you get your strategy wrong, your tactics will not be effective. Likewise, bad tactics can not save a good strategy from failure. You will just be expending your limited resources in pursuit of a wrong course. And sooner or later, you are bound to fail. Good tactics allow you to achieve your strategy with minimal resources – all things being equal.
IF YOU DON’T HAVE A LEVERAGE, GET ONE IMMEDIATELY. IF YOU HAVE ONE, STRENGHTEN IT.
As has already been mentioned earlier, the N.D. militants have recorded a remarkable victory by forcing the evil Nigerian government to call for a summit. Although, it’s obvious that the so called Niger delta summit is another trick or plot that the descendants of usman dan fodio has devised to buy time in order to carry out its hidden agenda. The task before them now is to increase their leverage before and during the summit and/or negotiations. The word leverage has its roots from the word ‘lever.’ As we learnt in our physics class, with the help of a lever, heavy loads can be lifted with very little force. Without a lever, this would have been much difficult or practically impossible. Similarly, in negotiations or conflicts, a lever helps us to neutralise or counter whatever advantage a strong or powerful opponent may have over you. A leverage helps a side, which may look weaker, to strengthen its position and consequently defeat or get a better deal from a very strong opponent that may appear invincible. In negotiations and conflictology, a leverage helps you to strengthen your position before your opponent. Leverage, at least, helps you to level the field when competing with a formidable opponent.
Leverage comes in different forms. It could be a piece of information that you have about your opponent, which he is unaware of, and you can use it in negotiations to get a concession from a very powerful opponent. Leverage could even be a piece of information that is publicly available, but be psychological in nature. For example, by openly or secretly revealing to your opponent that in actual fact, he is very vulnerable and not as strong or invincible as he believes, or wants you to believe. If you don’t have a leverage that you can use to counter a much stronger opponent in a negotiation or conflictology, your opponent, believing in his invincibility, will always take advantage of you and dictate to you his terms.
The strategy of the militants should revolve around not only putting pressure on these 3 monsters to want to negotiate and reach agreements with them (militants) as quickly as possible, but negotiate with them as equals during the summit. In fact, the militants need to adopt a strategy that will make these 3 monsters ‘beg’ them, and not dictate to them before and during negotiations.
In order to achieve this, the militants need to strengthen their leverage to the maximum. Thus, the strategy the N.D. need to adopt in order to strengthen their leverage is to prove and demonstrate to these 3 monsters that they are indeed very vulnerable and not invincible as they might have thought. But it takes an analytic mind to figure out these vulnerabilities.
1 comment
thanks Bode, but you should always finish your articles before submitting them. We want to be able to digest everything in one seating.
Thanks sha.