11. Are they afraid of been raided by their neighbours, Ndigbos, if they form their own sovereign country?
12. Is there any justification for this fear?
13. If there is a justification, then is there any way for them to remain on their own and still protect themselves from the invasion of the Ndigbos?
14. Which issues could lead to tension between them and the Ndigbos?
15. What mechanisms, acceptable to the two parties, could be used to minimize or remove them completely?
16. As a sovereign country, what kind of political, economic and military relationships do they want to establish with other ethnic groups in
17. If they eventually decide to form their own sovereign country, which ethnic groups would it consist of?
18. How do their people or indigenes feel about getting rid of the north, and forming their own separate country?
19. How are they going to sell such idea to their people?
20. Which territory or communities will go into forming their sovereign country?
21. Are they in support of
22. Would they want the capital to be relocated to the South south?
23. How should the Nigerian army and police be restructured?
24. What is the minimum percentage of their indigenes that must be recruited by the Nigerian army, State Security Service and police?
25. What is the justification for the north to concentrate all
26. Do they support the fact that all of
27. What do they think about the idea of redistributing
28. What is their opinion on federalism?
29. How hard are they going to push for federalism?
30. How are they going to argue for compensation for past economic deprivation by the northern government? What formula will be used in the calculation?
31. What percentage of their indigenes must make up future cabinet of ministers?
If I were to be a consultant or adviser to the
Apart from the political and economic benefits of breaking away which were highlighted in my articles “One Nigeria: To be or not to be? (parts 1-6), there is another rational reason behind this advise . It’s based on simple logic and common sense. Presently, by taking up arms against the northern led federal government, the militants are already risking their lives. Therefore, what is the sense or the justification in risking their lives for peanuts. Why risk your lives for a mere 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 or even 50% increase to the
Since the risk is the same, but with different outcomes, rewards or dividends, why not go for the maximum dividend – sovereignty? In these crises, the best option for the N.D. is what we call “the pareto-optimal” in game theory. The pareto optimal is the best allocation that best serves their self-interest. In game theory, an allocation is pareto optimal if there is an alternative allocation at which one person is better off and no one is worse off. An allocation is not pareto optimal (i.e. it’s not a good allocation) if there is another better allocation at which at least one person is better off and no one is worse off. The N.D. crisis is a typical ‘zero-sum’ game, most especially with the north. Zero sum games are games in which the players have completely opposite interests, that is, the gain for one player equals the loss for another player. It’s a strictly competitive game in which the players can not hope to improve their pay off through any kind of co-operation. If the N.D. play a non-zero sum game or try to reach a non-pareto optimal with the north within the scope of
Another major reason why I am advising the N.D. to make setting up their own sovereign state their main objective is that there is the danger that any (preliminary) agreement reached with the north at the summit may be over turned in the next 5, 10, 15 or 20 years by a northern military dictator, who might come to power through a military coup, or by a northern civilian president through a constitution review/amendment in the Senate or House of Assembly where his party has the overwhelming majority as is the case with the PDP today. Nobody can give a hundred percent guarantee that there will be no more military coups or election riggings in
Going by this reasoning, my advice for the
1. The British formed
2. They have no legal obligation before
2. After almost 50 years since
3. They want to rule themselves and concentrate their resources exclusively on their own development. This is the wish of their people.
TO BE CONTINUED….
1 comment
thanks Bode, but you should always finish your articles before submitting them. We want to be able to digest everything in one seating.
Thanks sha.