As the dust settles and the final results of the Edo Governorship election are officially in, it’s a sobering moment for those of us who had hoped for a shift in political direction. While the outcome was largely predictable, the sheer number of votes the All Progressives Congress (APC) managed to secure under Monday Okpebholo remains a jarring reality.
Despite APC’s well-documented failures at the national level—worsening economic conditions, escalating insecurity, and a general decline in the quality of life—Okpebholo clinched 291,667 votes to emerge as the governor-elect. His closest rival, Asue Ighodalo of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), finished with 247,274 votes, while Olumide Akpata of the Labour Party (LP) secured a distant 22,763 votes.
However, Okpebholo’s declaration as the winner has been met with significant controversy. Protests erupted among PDP supporters, who strongly assert that the results were fabricated and did not reflect the will of the people. The Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room (NCSSR) reported alarming instances of voter inducement at polling units across the state.
“Situation Room observers reported widespread instances of blatant vote buying and selling across several polling units, despite the huge presence of security personnel,” the group stated in a release co-signed by Yunusa Z. Ya’u, Mimidoo Achakpa, and Franklin Oloniju. They revealed that the price of votes ranged from ₦5,000 to ₦10,000 in various locations, including PU08 and 09 Ward 2, Owan-East LGA; PU 02 Ward 2, Etsako-West LGA; and several polling units in Egor, Oredo, and Owan-West LGAs. Disturbingly, some voters were also induced with food items like bread.
This result, more than anything, reflects a national problem of disillusionment and political complacency. It’s baffling that despite the glaring shortcomings of the APC, the electorate in Edo State would still cast their votes for a party that many feel has overseen Nigeria’s decline. The power of party machinery and grassroots mobilization seems to have trumped the need for competent governance and true reform.
The outcome also highlights a deeper issue: many voters may have lost faith in the possibility of real change. In a country plagued by broken promises and failed leadership, voters appear stuck in a cycle where mediocrity is not only tolerated but also perpetuated. How else can we explain the continued support for a political party that has so widely disappointed on the national stage?
In Edo State, the numbers speak for themselves. Despite the PDP’s valiant effort to maintain control of the political machinery, they were outmatched by the deeply entrenched political structures that seem immune to the frustrations of the people. Monday Okpebholo, a candidate many dismissed as lacking vision, is now at the helm.
This is not just a reflection of Edo politics; it’s a sobering reminder that our democracy still faces significant challenges. Edo State, like many others in Nigeria, deserves leadership that can break away from recycled political actors and offer a fresh, hopeful future. But instead, we are witnessing the same old patterns repeating themselves, with voters sticking to the status quo out of fear, loyalty, or resignation.
The future of Edo is now at a crossroads. The decisions made in this election will shape the trajectory of the state for years to come. But what does this result mean for Nigeria as a whole? Are we doomed to watch this same scenario play out in other states, or will this serve as a wake-up call for voters to start demanding better from their leaders?
It’s time to rethink our political choices. If we don’t, we may find ourselves lamenting the lost opportunities for progress in the years to come.
